The 9/11 footage always looked fishy to me from the start … a missing plane after the pentagon was attacked (it supposedly vaporized entirely), explosions out of sync with the planes hitting the towers (apparently various bombs blasts), and the apparent molten metal pouring out the walls suggest so. Still, it’s hard to believe the US committed this upon its own people.
It’s more believable to assume the Israelis are responsible, to garner anti-Muslim/Arab support from the world and especially the US. This is not without precedence as the Israelis committed attacks on their own embassy in London (1994), called a false flag operation, according to Annie Machon (former MI5 officer).
The thing that makes me think twice about this is the fact that 9/11 occurred on US soil. Would the Israelis have run this sort of operation in the US, their best ally? I doubt it, but apparently I’m not the only one to give this some thought as it’s cropping up on the Net.
Whatever the real truth is, I really don’t think the official 9/11 story is it. It’s rather self-evident, at least to me.
All rights reserved on the article, defined as the text and any original material and medium –including photographs when specifically mentioned in at least one of the following corresponding elements: caption, alternate text, or title. Quoted texts, and other material not copyrighted by Maurice Cepeda, are used under the concept of fair use and are the properties of their respective owners –including photographs, audio recordings, videos, or any other products in any form or fashion– as are all brands mentioned. If copyrighted videos and/or audio recordings should make themselves into articles, note that they are not hosted herein; if you are the copyright holder of any such material (and have a problem with fair use), approach the appropriate hosting site. Any audio or visual material (or any combination thereof) incorporated under fair use, either hosted locally (if that should come to be) or otherwise, will most likely be of lesser quality, thus, “fair use”. By reading this article, the reader forgoes any accountability of the writer. The reading of this article implies acceptance of the above stipulations.