The following were posters put out by the American government to dissuade WWII soldiers from participating in “risky behaviour” while on duty overseas. We’re supposed to assume that the targeted practice is with prostitutes, but I don’t see it.
All I can see is an association between being foreign with (as it used to be called) venereal diseases (VDs), or Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs). [Newsflash; Apparently the name has changed again --this time to STIs, sexually transmitted infections.]
High cheek bones, dark hair, thick lips, a beret, it’s like the image is associating STDs with not being a white American, that is, foreign women –ah, that tempting forbidden fruit.
The primary intention of the ads, keeping American soldiers away from foreign prostitutes, could have been done better, and thus racist “undertones” would have been avoided –which I’m sure didn’t help race relations with Hispanic Americans (before the contemporary illegal immigration problem from Mexico), as the above could pass off for aforementioned women –which, incidentally, says a lot for the conception white Americans have in respect to the “other” and themselves.
I guess this post wouldn’t be complete if I’d leave it at that, just bringing up garbage from the past that no one wants to examine (it seems my Facebook friends have lost interest in chatting with me after posting these photos). So what’s the relevance today? Have we learned from these gross, inept, stereotypes? Are we any better off today? In this American “war” against terror, do we take the time to examine and avoid prejudices?
While going through American airports, family members and I have repeatedly been asked to go through the slowest lines. During this process of searching for “items of terror”, underwear and personal care products are seemingly paraded in full view of the public. That is, despite that luggage goes through scanner type machines, everything but everything is opened and inspected without the least regard to one’s privacy or care for one’s time spent packing. I don’t know why one spends so much time properly folding everything if rent-a-cops are simply going to forage through and leave a mess of everything. I’ve found these inspectors so inept that I’ve had to educate them by insisting my laptop not be ex-rayed, because the damage this technology poses to circuit boards.
I know the American news has gone on and on about the lack for security in airports the last few years, but –seriously– isn’t standing in multiple lines for multiple scanner machines and having one’s luggage repeatedly opened and flopped all about at any given airport –especially when one is just making a connection and hasn’t even left the area– a bit much?? I’ve had to go through this seemingly unreasonable and idiotic exercise in futility and idiocy (or is that in patience?).
Consider I’m not Muslim, Arab, nor of Middle Eastern descent. I don’t look exactly like the sort of people illustrated in the posters. For instance, I don’t have high cheek-bones, my eyes are brown but lighter than most brown eyed people, and my hair is curlier than those in the pics. Regardless, I’m certainly “other” enough to stand out and warrant special attention. I guess I shouldn’t wonder too much why some get fast tracked through airports, while I’ve been left feeling like I’m some unlucky winner to some lottery from hell I never entered. I can only imagine it must be worse for people that exactly fit the profile of the “Muslim other”.
My sense is that people get isolated for nothing more than having remotely similar physical features to the people depicted above, big brown eyes, dark hair, and anything darker than albino white skin. Profiling may not add up to much more than racism. One must ask, “Having established Muslims come in all types, why waste time on profiling, especially assuming terrorists are likely to take advantage of North American bigotry and deploy blond blue eyed operatives?
I assume there’s a blanket policy, in as far as non-whites. I honestly question the logic of targeting swarthy/brown skinned people with brown eyes as potential Arab terrorists. Now if you were involved in the “war on terror”, here are no brainer questions to ask yourself. You know that you’re looking for extremist terrorist Muslims, to start off with.
Are all Muslims Arabs?
The answer to that is no.
And where I wanted to get to …
Are all Arabs brown?
Muslims could look like any race. There’s even white Arabs, and –get this– there’s even light skinned Middle Eastern people, supposedly the ancestors to white Europeans –although I think this has been debunked, but the point is Islam is an international religion, and thus has taken in converts from all “races”. And Muslims (and Middle Eastern people as a whole for that matter) come in all colours. So, just as Muslims come in all shapes, sizes, and colours, it stands to reason the radical jihadist terrorist variety does as well. So what’s the use of profiling and targeting people based on colour if extremist Muslims come in all flavours? And more importantly, how’s profiling any different from discrimination based on the pseudoscience of physiognomy?
Perhaps you should be up front about American prejudices and, in a fashion reminiscent of McCarthyism, ask suspects …
Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Muslim religion or your family of Arab decent?
And just to make sure you get to the truth, maybe ask them if they accept the Lord Jesus Christ as their personal Lord and saviour.
There’s two conclusions I’ve come to. First, it’s quite a humiliating experience to go through an American airport these days, if you’re not obviously white, and second, ignorance still runs deep in America.
All rights reserved on the article, defined as the text and any original material and medium –including photographs when specifically mentioned in at least one of the following corresponding elements: caption, alternate text, or title. Quoted texts, and other material not copyrighted by Maurice Cepeda, are used under the concept of fair use and are the properties of their respective owners –including photographs, audio recordings, videos, or any other products in any form or fashion– as are all brands mentioned. If copyrighted videos and/or audio recordings should make themselves into articles, note that they are not hosted herein; if you are the copyright holder of any such material (and have a problem with fair use), approach the appropriate hosting site. Any audio or visual material (or any combination thereof) incorporated under fair use, either hosted locally (if that should come to be) or otherwise, will most likely be of lesser quality, thus, “fair use”. By reading this article, the reader forgoes any accountability of the writer. The reading of this article implies acceptance of the above stipulations.