Linux Loses Con Kolivas
There is quite a lot of noise about Con Kolivas, and his recent quiting Linux kernel development. Kolivas made enormous contributions in the way of improving desktop usability and responsiveness, drawing attention to this increasingly coalescing factor when few people were paying attention, presumably something of which Torvalds’ himself was not aware.
Con Kolivas’ quiting explains various issues with Linux these days. First, that Linux is primarily optimized for the uses of those that fund its continued development to the detriment of common desktop users (think IBM, they’ve invested millions of dollars into Linux –last I read– and have a lucrative server business based on Gnu-Linux). Meaning, that the continued development of the Linux kernel has been toward the server end and not the desktop user. That is to say, the Linux kernel does not meet ordinary desktop user needs. This is extraordinary. After all, Linux was initially an end user product, as Torvalds envisioned it to meet his university student needs — AFAIK these were not of the server kind in nature. Thus, Linux has lost it’s original vision of meeting the needs of the ordinary user, graphical in nature –albeit– nowadays.
What does this mean? Well, simply that Linux for the desktop is slow. Kolivas points out that given the processor speed increases, desktop responsiveness should be excellent. I can attest, it’s not, although he seems to allow a lack of hardware innovation to explain some of the discrepancy.